Tube DIY Asylum

Do It Yourself (DIY) paradise for tube and SET project builders.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: Listen for yourself

Posted by cpotl on July 7, 2017 at 11:56:14:
" Let's say we know 100 things about audio we can test. Could there be 100 more we do not know yet. Infinity is a pretty big place. To go from I know a few things about the human body and energy to I know everything is hardly what I would call rational."

Well a question one has to ask is, is there any compelling evidence that the 100 things we already know are insufficient to account for the observed phenomena? I get the impression sometimes that some people just don't want the things we already understand to be able to explain the things we observe.

As I have said before, I am not for one moment disputing that SET amplifiers may sound different, and indeed better, than other amplifiers. There are some "obvious" reasons why this might be the case. Is there compelling evidence that the obvious and already understood reasons are insufficient to explain the observed phenomenon?

Chris