|
Speaker Asylum General speaker questions for audio and home theater. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
Those darn measurements !
Posted by J. Phelan on June 23, 2017 at 15:17:03:
I mean, I respect Stereophile's efforts -they do a LOT more than others.
But with the Devore Orangutan O/96 and now Volti Rival, I guess we're right back where we started. A speaker swooned by a reviewer -but to have (noted) problems under test.
From my understanding, Paul Klipsch was reluctant to send his (horn) speakers in for review. Esp. in the 60s, when magazines were measurement-heavy in their reports. His designs were competitive in sound but they didn't measure too good.
What's going on here ? I thought speakers were the (one) category that had strong correlation with perceived sound quality. Does this only apply to cone speakers ?
Maybe its not using a (true) anechoic chamber or measuring from 1.5m away (2m might be better -give the speaker more time to 'gell').
Then speed -something a horn is known for. But no way to measure that -imagine putting an odometer inside a speaker !
After testing the Volti, John Atkinson confirmed Paul Klipsch -go out and here it.