Speaker Asylum

General speaker questions for audio and home theater.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

The Welti paper is not worth the paper it is printed on if good bass at one seat is your goal

Posted by Richard BassNut Greene on March 5, 2007 at 09:45:03:
Welti averages bass frequency responses at 16 seats located in the middle of a very large listening room.
If your room is similar and you can place your ears in 16 locations simultaneously, then the Welti paper is just for you.
I want to know the frequency response for my two ears with no averaging, and I want a subjective judgement on two-channel suybwoofer/satellite speaker integration from my one seat.
Welti does not provide any of these answers.
(Nor does he claim to)
His paper could be applied to surround sound in a small theater.
.
.
.

Richard BassNut Greene
Subjective Audiophile 2007