![]() ![]() |
Speaker Asylum General speaker questions for audio and home theater. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
a couple of Lambda comparisons
Posted by Duke on September 25, 2002 at 06:13:46:
thylantyr -
Most of my experience has been with the Lambda TD15X Apollo and the TD15M Apollo. I haven't heard the TD15H Apollo, but I'm sure there's a strong family resemblance.
The thing that sold me on the Lambda woofers is how good they sound in the midrange. They are across-the-board better than the 15" Altec 414 and 515 drivers I've played with (okay, the 515's were more efficient, but the Lambda's were way more musical up & down the scale).
The Pioneer TAD woofers are very serious competition for the Lambdas, and vice versa. Both are very lively, quick and dynamic. Both have superb resolution and bottom-end slam. In the systems I've heard, I'd say the TAD's were a bit tighter in the very bottom end, and the Lambda's had a bit more weight and better midrange. However, I haven't heard the Lambda's in the same ultra-slow-rolloff alignment as I heard the TAD's, so I can't say for sure that the Lambda's wouldn't be just as tight in that case.
Comparing the two Lambda woofers I have, the TD15X woofer goes deeper and will shake the whole room, while the TD15M has probably the best midbass and midrange I've ever heard from a large cone, and retains its liveliness down to a lower volume level than any other cone I've heard. Unfortunately, the TD15M has limited X-max, and really doesn't do the bottom octave, which the TD15X does. So I'd have to say the TD15X is probably the better all-around woofer.
One final point in favor of the Lambdas is designer/builder Nick McKinney. He's a real prince to work with.
Duke