Rocky Road

From Classic Rock to Progessive to hip hop to today's hot new tunes!

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

CSN and CSN Y

Posted by PdL on July 6, 2006 at 17:22:36:
Do you think CSN would have had more succes or a longer creative period if they had never welcomed Neil Young into the trio? From what I've read about these guys, Stills and Young had clashed all the way back to their Buff Springfield days. And then add another huge ego (Crosby's) and all the blow those guys did - it seems like a clear recipie for an implosion. CSN and CSNY wrote a lot of great music but their output is no where near as prodigous as Young's. Even if you think that a quarter (a third?) of Neil's solo work is shit, he still has a substanially bigger catalog than CSN. Did CSNY (and perhaps CSN too) ultimately disintegrate due to too chiefs and not enough indians, so to speak?