Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Wrong again

Posted by E-Stat on October 15, 2010 at 14:31:15:
My question to him had nothing to do with the null hypothesis. Can't you figure that out?
The real problem is to find reports which establish that there are audible differences between speaker wires...
The real problem is finding anyone who bothers to test the highest performance cabling. Such doesn't happen or they use erroneous test procedures using unproven assumptions.
There is no burden of proof to establish something it is impossible to establish.
Ever the pedantic reply. Perhaps if I simplify the story, you might be able to understand it.
1. Mtry claimed that expensive (I would say high performance) cables have been involved in DBTs.
2. I ask him for examples
3. He declines saying he doesn't need to prove his claim.
Yet you are silly enough to ask the mtrycrafts provide evidence to support a negative hypothesis *YOU* have laid out!
Are you really incapable of understanding the above? My question to him has nothing at all to do with the null hypothesis. I questioned his claim and he folded. Surely you are smarter than that - even if your memory is poor.
Do you understand the question now?
edit: You probably don't any better today than long ago. here is where we first discussed his inability to document any of his claims. I replied to a really funny post of his where he demonstrates that he is utterly incapable of following a story (like you) and rants on. Here is my reply to his post. I should have included this other line from his post:
"They are not equally expensive as one was $990. the other a cheapo."
One cost $300 while the other, about $110.
rw
rw