Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Pro Audio Asylum

Pro studio recording equipment and music production/industry.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

107 dB/1w/1m?

Posted by bassbinotoko on July 16, 2010 at 12:18:51:

That spec makes me a little skeptical. It wouldn't be the first time a typo has appeared in a catalog listing. Or a sketchy brand has printed incorrect information due to ignorance or deception. If they're as wrong as that about efficiency, I'd hesitate to trust anything they say about it.

It may be good value for a home infinite baffle or open baffle design. Possibly a vented box if you're willing to measure the actual T-S parameters.

The manual here: [url]http://www.pyleaudio.com/manuals/PDW21250.pdf[/url]
has T-S parameters, and says efficiency is 100 dB +/- 3 dB
Fs 22.4
Re 6.3
Qms 2.5961
Qes 0.3801
Qts 0.3315
Vas 703.8 liters
Sd 0.1706 m^2
EBP 58.8
Xmax 9 mm

The original post by Magnetar with the T-S specs was moved to Texas (baby, bathwater...) and I can't find a link to it. In a previous post he says every driver was slightly different, like different baskets and terminals and dust caps, although cone, magnet and surrounds appeared to be identical.

Quoted from another forum...
"From Magnetar over on DIYaudio.

Using 250 grams "mass loading" method and LIMP this is pretty much where they all average-

FS - 31.61
RE - 5.59
RES- 59.81
QMS- 4.03
QES- 0.38
QTS- 0.34
L1- 1.88
VAS - 274.29 liters
SPL - 95.4