Shutterbug Strasse

A photographer's haven for the lastest in digital or traditional film cameras.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Re: That funny thing that digital does to colors...

Posted by Bold Eagle on January 6, 2003 at 10:58:52:
It can't be just being digital. (resolution maybe? or ordered rows of pixels versus the random lay of color dots in film?) I use a slide/film scanner on my 35 mm slides and negatives, and the pictures I'm getting don't look "digital". Yet the scan process certainly is digital. And sure, I play with the file in a photo processing program. But you really need to do that to digital camera files, too. I don't think we're quite to the point of printing right off the camera. Although the latest photo printers are now claiming automatic post processing (like the Fuji machine down at Walmart does, I guess)for color and contrast.