Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Computer Audio Asylum

Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

Any point in using a Monarchy Audio DIP in front of a Benchmark DAC1?

Posted by dsdreamer on July 29, 2008 at 16:28:21:

I am planning on using a Toslink from an Apple Airport Express to stream to a Benchmark DAC1. I would like to do something about the likely jitter on the digital audio stream from the Airport Express, but fear that the Monarchy DIP may be doing nothing different than the asynchronous sample rate conversion the comprises the Benchmark's so-called "jitter rejection mechanism" already does.

I guess what I need here is a real 'PS/Genesis digital lens', so I may have to wait for PS Audio to get such a thing to market. But if anyone has an argument why the little black box from Monarchy audio should be considered for my application, I would be glad reconsider my position.

TIA, dsdreamer