Computer Audio Asylum

Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

'Ultra-low jitter in my book is 10's of picoseconds, not 1nsec'

Posted by maabx on March 20, 2008 at 11:50:01:
And the test results for the products to which you are alluding, the ones with ultra-low jitter of 10's of picoseconds, are where?

'Read the description of the DDDAC. Identical implementation I believe:
http://www.dddac.de/ma_dac21.htm'

Sorry Steve, aside from using the same receiver, I see nothing identical in the implementation. Maybe you would like to point out the exact text that points to an identical implementation.

So, you are a manufacturer. And you say that the Theta TLC has to throw away samples. Putting aside the Theta for the moment, where does it state in the link you provided that the DDDAC (which apparently has many versions) throws away samples? Is it your understanding that it's the only possible way that it can stay sync'd?