|
Music Lane It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
Since when is 95% a distortion of 95%?
Posted by Analog Scott on June 12, 2012 at 22:35:12:
>> You're distorting Mike's original statement...... He said 95 percent of live *pop* music is either lip-sync'ed or played back....... I'm not sure if it's actually that high, but I'm certain it is high nonetheless.>>
That's nice. Since when has any of the examples I used to rebut his assertion fallen out of the general category of pop?
What exactly is "high?" some might see 1% as high.
>> Personally, if I thought he exaggerated the number, which might be the case, I'd maybe question the number....... But IMO, he's nailed the problem with most popular music today, exaggerated or not.>>
"The problem?" really this is "he" problem?
Either you think he exaggerated the number or you don't think he exaggerated the number. Which is it. I think he pulled it out of his ass and it is way off.
>>From me personally, what I find disappointing is the militant attitude from those either defending or denying the practice of faking performance.......>>
And who here is actually doing that? Smells like a burning straw mane to me.
>> And it's about time the few real music critics remaining developed a backbone and started going on the offensive........ As far as I'm concerned, the inmates have been running the asylum. For too long.>>
As far as I am concerned it's funny when one inmate calls another inmate crazy in any asylum.