![]() ![]() |
Music Lane It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
Surely your not talking about THIS recording???
Posted by Feanor on December 23, 2007 at 12:36:54:
I have the SACD which might makes some difference. But the recording sounds very good indeed to me.
Granted, Heifetz' violin is microphoned a bit closely, not exactly a 6th row orchestra sound -- maybe that's the problem?? Close-micing is common problem with classical recordings. Many producers and engineers seem to assume that listeners want to hear the performance as from the podium or a seat amongst the players. Most of us don't.
Still, the sound is very good: the close perspective lets you hear the rosin and such nuances. I find the SACD stereo layer from my modest Sony CDR-CE775 sounds slightly airier and perhaps more detailed than CD. However the CD layer, played back from my computer, sounds quite good, not harsh or disagreeable, actually a bit smoother than SACD from the Sony.
You should consider that the violin as a squeeky sounding instrument, especially if close-miced. Beyond that, maybe your $100K isn't so well choosen as you imagined. I guess my <$10k system has it beat for musicality: see it here, but note that the above comparison didn't use iTunes but instead Foobar2000 and ASIO output to the Audiophile USB.
Bill Bailey
___
Feanor's list of 250 Core Classical Compositions