Music Lane

It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

So you're saying...

Posted by SE on March 14, 2007 at 05:09:45:
That you consider the use of newer/higher quality recording technology to be an overt indication of LOWER QUALITY recordings? Or, are you saying that they are "trying to get one over" on consumers? I mean, BOTH are possible, but have rarely been the case in my experience. Recordings that state 20/24 bit on the label ARE usually better sounding -- again, in my actual experience. I mean, we COULD just offer up opinions based upon conceptual speculation -- or brand the whole thing as crap due to Digital Disease (the root cause of EVERYTHING right)? It's all a digital conspiracy to you, I suppose.