Planar Speaker Asylum

Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Prejudices don't get us anywhere...

Posted by neolith on March 30, 2018 at 06:14:33:
Sure, but they definitely keep AA and, in general, the internet lively.
In any case, your A, B,C, D analysis is a little too simple because the components are not necessarily independent but can have complex interactions. Some amps work better with some speakers and some do not wth neither speaker or amp being at fault. Also your premise that the 1.7 and 3.7 are similar might be amiss - different tweeters, crossover points, etc. Extending your argument and perhaps stretching it beyond what you intended, would an amplifier suitable for a MMG remain suitable for a 20.7 since the senstivities and impedance curves are similar?