![]() ![]() |
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
Heard from Wendell
Posted by josh358 on July 1, 2011 at 08:29:36:
He emailed to say that I'd misconstrued his intent. He wants to reduce the mass and improve the transient performance of *both* the MMG's woofer and tweeter. An interesting project indeed! He added that the previous experiment to which you had referred wouldn't work because it didn't change the bass/midrange. So I don't think we can use that as a guide to what we can expect from modifying the MMG.
I'm thinking I was also wrong in my assumptions about efficiency. I had in mind the formula efficiency = (contant) * Bl^2 * S^2 / M^2 * R. In a parallel configuration overall DCR remains constant, so I figured that only the reduction in mass would affect the efficiency. In fact, I'm thinking that I misapplied the formula, which doesn't directly apply to a series/parallel configuration. Forex, in a parallel configuration, current density will be reduced, so force, which is Il X B and so proportional to current, will be reduced commensurately.