|
Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
RE: "It's important to note that so far there is no direct evidence for either theory. "
Posted by dark_dave56 on June 2, 2021 at 08:31:17:
I tend to agree that the virus is of natural origin--there's lots of nasty stuff out there in nature that we haven't encountered yet. However, I also firmly believe that it was under study at the Institute of Virology and they had an "accident" that released it into the public.
It is just far too "coincidental" that the initially reported outbreak occurred in the immediate vicinity of China's ONLY Level 4 biohazard lab, that has acknowledged and is known for working with various coronaviruses.
I also firmly believe that the initial "accident" and subsequent outbreak occurred in October 2019, but was not acknowledged until the end of December--after it had gotten out of control, and could no longer be ignored/hidden. By the time the world was notified, the virus had a 3-month head-start, which I consider to be a significant factor in it becoming a global pandemic.
Not hatin', just sayin'...