Inmate Central

Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: How about when that "free speech" directly gets

Posted by rivervalley817 on May 1, 2021 at 20:14:44:
'for the speech to be illegal the words would have to be very direct'

huh ... that seems to conflate incitement along with instruction

'incitement' is always instigation though not necessarily 'instruction'

I recommend looking up Schenck v.United States if you're a legal geek

a lot of these terms and concepts get tossed around and mashed up in 'poli-speak'

personally, reading the Nuremberg Trials certainly gave an eye opening understanding of what constitutes incitement, instigation and coercement

all examined in great depth with heartbreaking detail

with regards,