Inmate Central

Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Two points: Merrick Garland shouldn't have been

Posted by tinear on April 15, 2021 at 13:06:56:
blocked from a hearing: that was Mitch, the great legislator, breaking with tradition--- and remember Ginsburg's successor? Mitch had no problem putting a replacement vote for her with weeks before the election.
Second: this court is alarmingly, and I mean "alarmingly," making vast numbers of unprecedented "shadow docket" rulings. This is against what Scalia and other conservative SCOTUS's previously have spoken out against.
"All told, the Trump administration sought emergency relief pending appeal 41 times in four years; in contrast, the Bush and Obama administrations together sought such relief eight times in 16 years. And the justices largely acquiesced to the Trump applications, granting 28 in full or in part".

If this isn't "judicial activism, what the heck is?