|
Jazz Alley From Louis Armstrong to Charlie Parker to the new greats of today, this is the place for Jazz! |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
Michael Brecker et. al
Posted by belyin on January 18, 2022 at 20:52:09:
Interesting that you bring up Michael Brecker. Ted Gioia recently blogged about Brecker--lamenting that despite other musicians (especially saxophonists) ravishingly singing his praises he is now virtually ignored by critics. So I Googled a bit and found the critical assessment of Michael Brecker (which I think is pretty apt) linked below.
Brecker was certainly an amazing technician and probably a very good person; I (and many others) never found him a particularly interesting artist. In my experience, musicians tend to be in awe of players with more chops than they have, and this speaks to the craft and professional aspects of being a musician. Saxophonist that come off of the jazz academy assembly line tend to revere Brecker; he was at the top of the quantifiable ladder of the jazz meritocracy that they as students are trying to climb. But artistry tends to be ineffable. How do you quantify an Albert Ayler or an Ornette Coleman. I know plenty of jazz college grads. who will tell you flat out the both of these great artists couldn't play their horn. Which is ridiculous; rather they chose to play in ways that made the standard criteria irrelevant. The jazz colleges teach jazz as a fixed body of music and musical practice, and this is at odds with the creation of art.