Home
AudioAsylum Trader
High Efficiency Speaker Asylum

Need speakers that can rock with just one watt? You found da place.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

There are other problems here

Posted by EGeddes on January 25, 2006 at 07:04:55:

I have always been concerned with the Unity approach because it seems to discount the fact that the sound from the drivers closer to the mouth also goes back down the horn body and reflects off of the other drivers thereby creating a secondary sound source which is significantly delayed from the first - usually a bad thing. The extent to which this is a problem is unknow to me since I have no data, but at first look it appeared that this could be an achiles heal to the design.

Perhaps Tom has some data that he can share showing the unEQ'd frequency response of a unity horn on axis. Seperatly for each set of drivers would be most enlightening.

Now for Pro usage, which I think was Tom's target application, this design has some real merits in its ability to "cluster" the multiple drivers required for very high SPLs into a small package. The tradeoffs here are very different and I might prefer Tom's approach to the line array approach that we see so often and which has some eal problems itself. But for home use where SPL is not a problem I think that there are cleaner approaches to the problem.

Earl Geddes