Video Asylum

TVs, VCRs, DVD players, Home Theater systems and more.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Invectives?

Posted by racerguy on August 24, 2007 at 14:43:46:
Which invectives were those? That I think you've created a bogus conspiracy theory? That I think you don't understand how/where/why MS and Sony are competitors? That I think you have emotionally invested yourself in a format? I don't see those as invectives. I see those as the reasons why you are mounting a flawed and unsupportable argument, and why you are attacking me by attempting to paint me as some sort of Microsoft supporter. This is the problem with format cheerleaders - if someone questions a format cheerleader's beliefs in any way, the cheerleader automatically assumes that the questioner is a cheerleader for the "other team."

Jazz, I didn't go down the path of conspiracy theory - you did. If you stuck to arguing based on technical merits, or provable facts and events, I never would have said a thing. When you started ranting about suspicions of skullduggery, you left yourself open to question. If you want to call that "invectives," have at it. I'll just point out again that it was you who put forth an unsupported conspiracy theory, and I'll say as my final word that arguing the finer points of your construct is not worth my time.

Best regards,

racerguy