Hi-Rez Highway

New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: You raise some points I do agree with

Posted by jitter2 on July 19, 2012 at 08:02:19:
Gross weight of a disc player does not necessarily equate to better sound. You need to be more specific about where that weight is weightier and why that increased weight means longer part life and/or improved sound. Advances in material development/implementation have and are trumping part weight as principle criteria for durability. I have an old Victor phonograph from early days of sound and its a lead weight. Does that mean it was more reliable or sounded better than lightweight players?