![]() ![]() |
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
Re: It also demonstrates that there is nothing inherently compromised about the CD sections of SACD players...
Posted by chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com on October 7, 2003 at 12:45:39:
"...if the playback quality can be raised to equal or exceed that of CD-only machines that retail for much more than I paid for my player AND mods, merely by replacing some parts."
Merely by replacing some parts?
That's a very big MERELY Methos, especially when considering how many parts are replaced and the same applies to standalone CD players anyway - replace a few parts and they perform better than more expensive players even when the price of the mods are calculated in.
Replace the diesel engine in my van with a turbo-charged petrol and it'll compete with vans costing much more. Doesn't mean the current engine in the bloody thing couldn't pull you out of bed as it is though. :0)
"I believe it likely that you paid considerably MORE for your digital source than I did."Dunno - I paid £3,425 for transport and DAC but save on money on every single CD purchased compared to SACD, only of course I can buy what I want and am able to buy many used CDs which are even cheaper.
Now 'fes up how much your player + mods cost.... :0)
Best Regards,
Chris redmond.