![]() ![]() |
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
I see you are a mfr ...
Posted by andyr on October 9, 2014 at 19:33:53:
of rack systems.
That might explain why you have displayed little knowledge of TTs? :-))
Linn (and others) use 3 springs not because they are convinced they can "defy the laws of physics and isolate an object from all sources of vibration simultaneously " but because they feel a sprung TT does not suffer from problems which solid-plinth TTs do.
Those mfrs who make non-sprung TTs rely on some kind of isolation devices to make their TT work well (eg, Vibraplanes, Minus Ks etc.) - not so much against footfalls caused by 400 lb spouses boogie-ing right in front of the turntable but from terrestrial vibrations, such as trains which are adjacent to the building structure. I would suspect that doing as you suggest (replace the springs with some hardwood or better yet metal blocks and then place your massloading weight on it) would produce such problems - however, it is easy enough for me to try this experiment. :-))
Linn (and the other suspended TTs) use springs - or in SME's case, rubber O-rings - to prevent these vibrations from getting to the stylus. AIUI, they only work down to (in Linn's case) about 5Hz - so there still may be a need for some other isolation device down to 1 or 2 Hz - depending on your surroundings.
Re. your comment "Finding the correct formula is moot" ... I find that very strange. :-)) It seems to me the springs will bounce better if the total weight of bearing/platter and 2 arms is shared equally across the 3 springs - rather than, say, the weight being 50% on one, 30% on another and 20% on the 3rd.
Thanks to the help I received here from Bill and Todd, I have been able to slightly adjust the position of the bearing which now - according to my calculations - gives me almost exactly equal loading, when the weight & position of the arms are also taken into account. I will post on this, soon.
Regards,
Andy