Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

I must agree...

Posted by RGA on July 13, 2015 at 17:31:39:
I was loathing this from what I felt were painfully horrid previews and the 28% fresh rating on rottentomatoes.

Perhaps my expectations being low was part of it but I rather enjoyed this one - better than the previous two (granted that's not saying much) but I also put it ahead of Jurassic World and San Andreas as recent blockbusters.

I'm a Doctor Who fan so the timey wimey stuff was a breeze to follow (and indeed they had Doctor Who himself Matt Smith there to help people just go with it since it's the time travel trope logic). The casting was pretty solid though I would have preferred a better Reese - someone less of a jar-head.

Some of the criticism seems to be over stupid things like "this movie cancels the first two" but those arguments are usually always stupid. The first two were time travel films so of course they could in theory come back to the same time lines.