Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

The reason is obvious

Posted by Analog Scott on June 9, 2007 at 14:34:35:
There is a large number of people who simply cannot go to R rated movies and those people make upa huge section of the movie ticket buying population. Not only that but that same group generally needs a parent or adult to take them to those PG movies making for more ticket sales. It aint rocket science.

>>not all of them "Hollywood", but all (I think) had Hollywood money in them.<<

This strikes me as a form of self serving circular logic about "Hollywood" making bad movies. It looks like you are saying that if "Hollywood" makes a good film it is by definition not a "Hollywood" movie. So what is the point of claiming "Hollywood" movies are bad when in effect your defintion of a "Hollywood movie" is a *bad movie* rather than a movie made by "Hollywood?"