Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Miro, Klee, Chagall... all had a good sense of humor. Rothko is like

Posted by tinear on February 4, 2007 at 08:47:48:
Tarkovsky. He takes a different mindset.
Stare at a painting of his and colors blend, disappear, reappear, and distort. It's kind of like a meditation. Art distilled to its core, color and form. No easy appeal to pre-formed emotions, i.e. a depiction of Madonna. No attempt to seduce the viewer with humor or cleverness, as the three aforementioned.
Unlike a lot of artists' works, Rothko's must really be seen in the original format. I never appreciated Warhol until I saw a collection of his works. The brilliant colors and perfection of the applications worked magic.