Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

While on second thoughts, and after looking at your original post with care...

Posted by orejones on December 30, 2004 at 01:41:43:

...I still find it confusing, not just to a foreigner: in it you simply dismiss the comment made earlier by Ian, laugh out loudly (probably, in a most pleasant bass...), and then mention two of his films. Now, trying to be honest, please read it again, and tell me how, without any previous references in that thread about your liking or disliking of those two films, or of Clint Eastwood´s directorial abilities, how can a reader know, just from reading your post, infer, much less deduct, that you are being ironic, or sarcastic..., instead of simply dismissing him because you value those films as poor ones, as PdL did, just a couple of thread lines down...

And now, looking at the whole thread, I see that it was not just me: Ian read your post like I did, and your response to Ian, the same you have included in your answer to my post, in which you try to ridicule my ability to understand the subtleties of the English language (what a pompous ass you are, clark...), was posted by you much later than my post..., and you have the gall to include it as proof of my nonunderstanding!

It is you who doesn´t write clearly, clark.

clark, you are not just ridicule: you are deeply, cowardly dishonest, beyond the usual standard in ultraright wingers. And your omphalocentric attitude is pitiable.

And I can´t remember having specifically included you in the group of mental midgets, but sure you know better than I...

All this said, I see no reason to apologize to you.

Regards

BF