Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: Where will Baldwin's blank take us?

Posted by Analog Scott on November 9, 2021 at 07:49:18:
Your analogy doesn't work nor does it reflect the law. If you are at a cross walk do you look both ways? Yes.But if you don't and someone comes around the corner at 90 mph and hits you are you legally at fault? No.

Should Baldwin have insisted on inspecting the gun? Obviously in retrospect yes. Was he legally obligated to inspect a gun that was declared cold by the 1st AD? No. It's his option not his legal responsibility. The armorer and the 1st AD should do time. They were the ones who completely ignored and broke protocols.