Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Re: How did it compare to the 588?

Posted by jerryalz on March 13, 2003 at 03:46:42:
Had the two units side by side, same interconnects, stock power cords, the cd-3 was the hands down winner, more transparent, more bloom, less digital sounding, and simply put the musicians in my room more than the 588. In fact, the cd-3 is so good that it will take a top notch sacd player playing sacd's to better its performance on plain red book cd's. This is unbelievably wonderful cd player.