|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
RE: Huge misconception regarding HDCD
Posted by J. Phelan on June 13, 2017 at 17:26:19:
Another winner -Charles should write a short book on the tech-history of digital, starting with custom filters in the late 1980s.
And HDCD was NOT the only format to fool people. So did Sony, making us think that DSD was a 1-bit system (in practice). But when we add signal processing and dither, it was 5-8 bits from the start. And this means it decimated and oversampled, (2) things we were told it would not do.
DSD was just a low-bit PCM system.
And extreme sampling rates. Whoops ! Mikes don't have sensitivities beyond 25khz, at least those used by audiophile labels.
Sony never provided recorders sampling at 192khz or beyond. (Maybe these exist now -but are rare, I think and expensive).
Even though DSD is mostly gone, we're still suffering (if we trust the theories against low-bit recording). Aren't most ADCs used today lower-bit devices ? Some labels never used these -they stood with 20-bit. But how many are there ? How many, in my view, are doing it right ?