Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: Gasp! More Jaws Dropping over MQA in Los Angeles!

Posted by ahendler on June 11, 2017 at 17:28:10:
They are not meaningless to him. He likes the sound of MQA streamed on Tidal even when played on a non MQA dac with partial decoding. It costs him nothing extra. I have done a lot of comparisons on the 2L site. When you compare the same master file in different resolutions including MQA the differences are very small. Certainly no jaw dropping experience. Maybe someday when there is a stand alone decoder I can place in front of my Master 7 my jaw will drop. We shall see. I really don't understand why you are coming on so strong. Most audiophiles either like MQA or don't or really don't care. I don't know who you are preaching to. Maybe Robert Harley and John Atkinson but certainly not me
Alan