|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
RE: USB clocking for 44.1k?
Posted by Thorsten on March 6, 2017 at 08:21:56:
Hi,
> Interesting, it was my understanding that recording studios routinely
> used one Master clock to sync everything.
>
> Maybe I misunderstood.
Maybe, instead of trying to understand how such systems work, you merely took away what you wanted and ignored most?
You cannot slave/sync the USB (or Wifi, or Ethernet etc. etc.) Clock directly to studio clocks, for the simple reason that the clock frequency is wrong.
The job of the "House Clock" is to synchronise the audio (and often video clocks) of multiple converters, so that multiple devices do not loose "sync".
You can see the need when handling Video & Audio using separate converters. I think you can also appreciate the need if we (say) use three stereo ADC's to make a six channel recording. Each individual Quarz Crystal in a given oscillator will have a frequency that is just a tiny bit different. So if we wait long enough, they will no longer be synchronised.
So while the need to synchronise clocks is obvious, there is a dirty little secret in that. Most Pro-Audio devices perform notably worse on external clocks, than when running on cheap internal crystals.
And of course on top of that any non-audio clock in the system (e.g. USB, Ethernet etc.) will not be synchronised to the audio clock.
You may find this article useful on the studio perspective:
http://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/does-your-studio-need-digital-master-clock