Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Better than nothing - but glaring inadequacies (of review) thoroughout.

Posted by carcass93 on December 13, 2009 at 06:57:18:
My biggest beef is, as usual, lack of meaningful comparisons. CEC TL-5100 is NOT very good transport, and non-oversampling Audio Note DAC of unspecified, and most likely lower end (DAC Zero?), model is hardly appropriate subject for comparison as well.

Regarding equipment itself - I think it's a mistake not to include video out for PWD, especially considering that there's no remote with a display, and no software (yet) to control it from PDA. Also, upcoming Bridge seemingly does not include digital out of any kind, so you won't be able to use PWD as Ethernet device supplying output to superior DAC (no big deal, since that wouldn't be cost-effective anyway).

Still, I would be interested in auditioning - but only when Bridge becomes available.