Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

It depends on what you mean by "good."

Posted by jsm on August 24, 2006 at 15:58:06:
What's good to one person is so-so to another and terrible to a third. I have two SACD/CD players that have listenable sound on CDs, but I really don't care for it all that much. These are the Sony C2000ES and the Pioneer 588A. I would call them fair at best, but maybe that's because I have become spoiled by my latest stand-alone CD player that is vastly better. Both of these players have much better sound than my first player, the original Sony CDP-101, and my second player, the Magnavox (Phillips) CDB-650, but they are not as good as another former player, the Arcam FMJ CD23, which should be no surprise. So, what do you mean by "good?"
Joe