Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

"For those of us who don't sit around fixated on the 'sound' of our systems . . . "

Posted by JoshT on August 14, 2006 at 12:38:57:
And which of the Asylees are you referring to, exactly? You are FAR too healthy! :-)
I more or less agree with you. I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. I'll buy some more SACDs from time to time and will listen to the SACDs I already have, so I need an SACD player. Between those and my CDs and LPs, I'll be satisfied. What annoys me, though, is the self-serving flip-flopping by the audio press and dealers. It would be fine if they said, "SACD is better, but it's dead, so we're going to focus on RBCD". But no. The approach seems to be, "Well, regardless of what we might have said before, we no longer believe SACD is better because RBCD playback has thoroughly reinvented themselves lately and is now better! It's so much better that we now prefer the RB layer on Hybrid discs! Yeah, that's the ticket!"