Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Re: Anti-jitter boxes

Posted by The Rube on June 28, 2006 at 20:19:09:
Hi, I was not convinced the Camelot Dragon 5.1 jitter filter had an impact until I tried running without it. I noticed a real loss of focus on the music. I recently stacked a first generation Camelot Dragon jitter filter/resolution filter with the original Dragon and noticed even more improvement. Everything just sounds tighter and more resolute.
I have tried the original Monarchy DIP and the AA Pro 32 as well. I did not think the improvement was as great, but in fairness, they were fairly brief auditions. The Dragon 5.1 is well worth the cash.
Rube