Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: Frequency response is sooooo 30 years ago

Posted by Story on January 7, 2024 at 05:10:58:
yes, things have progressed. Fully agreed with that. It's called progress for a good reason.

But saying that F, (as it was starting the Hi-Fi quest years ago), is like saying the past is no longer prologue. Instruments reproduced properly from an orchestra or amplifier are 'old' thinking and not quite as applicable today. The new ways are much better

The Stradivarius and Stratocaster will have a different sound, who cares, and F is old thinking and not as important.

ALL of the parameters in Audio are important. The measurements people do that reveal the character will come along with time because, as they are right now, - they are incomplete. The Human Ear knows better than that.

You can agree or disagree, but please don't link anything to another website or give me a diatribe on your disagreements. It's just my commentary and opinion, Scott.