Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: They're different experiences..

Posted by E-Stat on April 20, 2017 at 14:45:01:
I just thought high-end was about sound quality -and as soon as we move to the next level, we can't go back.
Sure - if the move doesn't involve any back stepping like it did with the CD. For decades of music released before either CD or high resolution formats were available, vinyl still offers audible advantages.
For many folk, old (or new) TV shows, shop-TV or the news, the old screen-size is better.
That's certainly not my preference. All of the TVs in my household are now 16x9 capable. When stuck, however, with 480p content old tubes look better to these eyes.
edit: I do hate it, however, when folks distort the image by stretching 4x3 content into a 16x9 presentation. My father-in-law can't tell the difference. :)