Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

well, yeah and no.

Posted by Analog Scott on April 19, 2017 at 12:00:15:
For instance one could do a low respolution digital copy of an analog tape recording and on the first pass lose an aweful lot of audible information. But...one can also take that low res digital copy and do a thousand generational copies with zero degradation. OTOH in the analog domain one can do a one to one copy on analog tape and have the first generation be virtually indistiguishable from the original but if one were to make a thousand generations of that original recording in analog you'd have an end copy that was far far more degraded than the low res digital copy. This test just doesn't hold up when condiering digital media. different rules