Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Audio critics should publish their hearing tests

Posted by triamp on March 21, 2017 at 16:39:14:
I sent the folowing to the editors of STEREOPHILE- and received no reply.

Editor
Stereophile Magazine
Via Email: STletters@entusiastnetwork.com

March 10, 2017

Dear Editor:

For the sake of honesty, transparency and credibility, I propose that your reviewers post results of their hearing tests- standard as well as extended high-frequency audiometry.

Your magazine publishes evaluations of audio equipment by your reviewers, and I think it would be only fair to readers- who might be spending large sums for equipment based in part on reviews they read in Stereophile- if those readers knew something about the hearing acuity of those reviewers.

If you decide to avoid providing this information, I'd like to know why.

Best Regards,