Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

I see your point

Posted by John Marks on March 24, 2008 at 11:01:17:
But I was trying to cover non-dispositive finality.

As in, "I can't decide how I really feel about these speakers, but, I am not going to go any further because I am not going to get involved with $35,000 two-way standmounts. So, if what I am hearing is a closer approach to the audio truth than I have ever heard before, too bad, it's over, next!"

But I guess that's dispositive in its own way.

Perhaps I should have used "conclusive finality" versus "inconclusive finality."

Thanks,

JM