Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

It would appear to me..

Posted by JCS on February 19, 2007 at 02:43:21:
.. that until the "appropriate" parties involved disclose what actually occurred we are unable to form an accurate opinion.
I would think that the publication, supposedly involved, that relys on the largess of its readers, manufacturers of equipment and advertisers as well as stock holders would want to have the sordid mess cleaned up.
Until that is done we are left to personal conjecture and will respond in a variety of ways. Such as pull advertising, cancel subscriptions, no longer submit equipment for review, sell their stock et. al.
While it is true that you should not judge an organization, by the act of one indivdual, that organization will be so judged if it refuses to clear up the matter.