Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Re: This is an audio hobbyist group. . .

Posted by Pat D on April 25, 2006 at 18:33:00:
I know some audio hobbyists DO use them.
I have never pretended to be an expert on DBTs. We do have some here, however, and it is strange that you don't listen to them. I have been able to show how silly the arguments brought up here against them are with some relatively simple logic.
You are going against the established scientific principles, so it's up to you to provide the evidence that DBTs are unreliable or that sighted tests are reliable for small differences, or that this undefined thing you call observational listening is particularly reliable.
____________________________________________________________
"Nature loves to hide."
---Heraclitus of Ephesus (trans. Wheelwright)