Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Re: :)

Posted by bjh on April 24, 2006 at 23:02:08:
The "basic thrust" it now appears to me is that you're just another "angry" anti-cable guy.
You should really try to get over that. You see many audiophiles, myself included, are fully cognizant that much of the 'chatter' surrounding cables and cable marketing is a pile of bunk, and moreover there's currently little to separate the wheat from the chaff.
But that doesn't change the fact that, for whatever the reasons, cables *do* make a difference. So we simply live with it and go about choosing our cables the way we choose everything else ... with out ears!
Will the explanations, the science, finally catch up? Well it would be nice, yet we in the hobby has lived without the science to explain much more then just why cables matter, we've adjusted to it ... it's like breathing ... better than choaking anger.