![]() ![]() |
Amp/Preamp Asylum Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
Re: Are active preamps a pointless appendage of a bygone age?
Posted by Jim McShane on April 10, 2006 at 10:00:38:
I think what needs to be understood about a passive is that it simply has to be used in the right circumstances to be the right choice. I have used a passive for many years - but I drive it from low impedance outputs, and it drives a high input impedance amp. The cabling is 1 meter or less of low capacitance cable. The amp achieves maximum output power at 1.5 volts input, perfect for a line level device.
I've had any number of preamps in the front end, but I'd never go back to active. The passive is the best so far.
I also believe (I can't prove this, nor would I quarrel with someone who believes otherwise) that the passives have gotten too complex to be as good as they can be. My favorite passive of all time is my "McShane" - a super pot, some excellent switches, good RCAs, short signal paths using good wire - and that's it! Simple = good in my view.
Maybe the extreme high end preamps would do better; but as Charles says elsewhere in this thread, in the right circumstances a passive a better choice for many people.