RE: Baerwald Nulls

Posted by John Elison (A) on September 30, 2007 at 12:13:33

In Reply to: Baerwald Nulls posted by jsusky on September 30, 2007 at 11:36:06:

> I seem to also recall that the angle-error-to-radius ratio was theorized
> (by Baerwald) to be proportional to frequency modulation distortion.

Actually, it is second harmonic distortion. ;-)

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Pinging Allen Wright - your "Cartridge Alignment Guide"? ... - andyr 05:23:50 09/30/07 (7)

Allen's alignement points are 57.8mm and 129mm - Mark Kelly 15:55:16 09/30/07 (2)

RE: Allen's alignement points are 57.8mm and 129mm - John Elison 21:15:24 09/30/07 (0)

Thanks, Mark. :-)) nt - andyr 16:16:51 09/30/07 (0)

Very Interesting Post! - John Elison 11:51:45 09/30/07 (1)

Thanks, John ... - andyr 14:30:55 09/30/07 (0)

Baerwald Nulls - jsusky 11:36:06 09/30/07 (1)

RE: Baerwald Nulls - John Elison 12:13:33 09/30/07 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Baerwald Nulls - John Elison 12:13:33 09/30/07 (0)

RE: Baerwald Nulls

Post a Message!