|
Vinyl Asylum Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ. |
|
|
|
Vinyl Asylum Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Dual vs. B&O; last time posted by PanzerVI on May 9, 2007 at 19:54:17:
... it's everything else :-P
Too durn complicated. Overbuilt/overengineered for the job at hand. Never cared for any of them: idler, belt, or DD. I own a 1019, but only for sentimental value (it was given to us by a good friend).b&o? Well, I use a b&o TX-2 in the living room. If nothing else, it tracks well. Given what I have invested in it, it's pretty good.
Yamaha, Sony, and Pioneer? With, as others have said, a very few exceptions, this is a pretty lackluster bunch. If you must have a massmarket Japanese TT, Your average Technics were probably better than most of the offerings of the aforementioned three.
JVC actually made some darn nice tt's in the late 1970's (available with or without arms), albeit DD.
all the best,
mrh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- the problem with vintage Duals isn't the idler drive... - mhardy6647 05:04:11 05/10/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
