Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Did anyone notice in the 40th anniversary issue of Rolling Stone that Ringo described The Beatles as a punk band? - HamBone77 08:56:22 05/04/07 (13)

• I dunno, none of them ever choked to death on their own vomit or anything - BatNastard 05:40:47 05/05/07 (1)
• Dang refresh - BatNastard 05:42:33 05/05/07 (0)
• I dunno, none of them ever choked to death on their own vomit or anything - BatNastard 17:04:46 05/04/07 (2)
• "You can't really dust for vomit" -nt - Bry 18:53:41 05/04/07 (1)
• "It was someone else's vomit" /nt - BatNastard 05:43:23 05/05/07 (0)
• Could they mean "punk" as in the attitude of the early Beatles, especially in Hamburg Pubs? - Teresa 16:15:49 05/04/07 (0)
• Re: Did anyone notice in the 40th anniversary issue of Rolling Stone that Ringo described The Beatles as a punk band? - mschlack 13:24:36 05/04/07 (0)
• Interesting thoughts....so far. - HamBone77 12:37:52 05/04/07 (0)
• The Beatles had a good punk 'tude early on, plus the definition - musetap 11:37:20 05/04/07 (0)
• Punk as ethos, rather than specifically trying to genre-alize, I would assume. - Vinylized 10:44:31 05/04/07 (0)
• Re: Did anyone notice in the 40th anniversary issue of Rolling Stone that Ringo described The Beatles as a punk band? - Beatlebum 09:39:51 05/04/07 (0)
• Re: Did anyone notice in the 40th anniversary issue of Rolling Stone that Ringo described The Beatles as a punk band? - Wendell Narrod 09:31:16 05/04/07 (0)
• Punk haircuts, maybe? - Muzikmike 09:14:04 05/04/07 (0)

Follow Ups

• Punk as ethos, rather than specifically trying to genre-alize, I would assume. - Vinylized 10:44:31 05/04/07 (0)