Vinyl Asylum Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: John, is Loefgren better for modern records? nt posted by Plinko on April 20, 2007 at 15:28:24:
Here is what the difference looks like. The red line represents harmonic distortion at a stylus tip velocity of 10-cm/s.Löfgren's alignment has lower RMS distortion, but it achieves that by having significantly higher inner groove distortion and slightly higher outer groove distortion. Personally I don't think that's such a good idea.
Baerwald's alignment has equal distortion at the three points of maximum distortion. I like that idea.
Now, these graphs are based on innermost and outermost groove radii of 60.325-mm and 146.05-mm respectively. Consequently, if you measure your LPs and determine they are different, say 65-mm and 145-mm for example, you can simply calculate a new set of Baerwald null-points for those parameters. In other words, if hardly any of your LPs have innermost grooves smaller than 65-mm, you will be better off calculating new Baerwald null-points than switching to Löfgren.
At any rate, I believe Baerwald's alignment is best, but you don't necessarily need to stick with null-points of 66-mm and 121-mm if your LPs do not conform to the specified innermost and outermost groove radii of 63-mm and 146-mm. You can easily calculate a new set of null-points using my spreadsheet, which can be downloaded at the link below.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I don't think so.... - John Elison 18:04:02 04/20/07 (3)
- What's best if Baerwald can't be achieved - Ralph NLD 12:17:54 04/21/07 (1)
- It's hard to say without more information.... - John Elison 12:49:22 04/21/07 (0)
- I think it has finally sunk in. I'll make my own with slightly different points. - Plinko 07:07:50 04/21/07 (0)